• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Constant current source

Page history last edited by Joe Redish 4 years ago

8.5.P6

 

In most of the circuit problems we have done in this class, we have used a battery as a power source. A battery provides a constant voltage difference across its terminals (for as long as it hasn’t used up its stored energy). But in some circumstances (such as powering LEDs or in patch clamping), a more complex device is used that provides a constant current. The basic Kirchhoff principles of circuits still hold so let’s work out what the implications are of having a constant current source (CCS) instead of a battery.

 

In the figure below are shown three situations: (A) a CCS connected across a single resistor; (B) a CCS connected across a pair of resistors in series; and (C) a CCS connected across a pair of resistors in parallel. The CCS puts out a current of I0 = 1 μA (= 1.0 x 10-6 Amps) and all of the resistors have the same resistance: R = 2 kΩ (= 2.0 x 103 Ohms).

 

A. Find the voltage drop across each of the resistors in each of the three cases. Explain your reasoning (briefly!). You may either give numerical values (with correct units) or express your answers in terms of I0 and R.

 

B. Find the voltage rise across the CCS in each of the three cases. Explain your reasoning (briefly!). You may either give numerical values (with correct units) or express your answers in terms of I0 and R.

 

C. Do the series and parallel rules for finding single-resistor-equivalent resistors look the same as when we hooked them up across a battery? That is, does case B look the same to the CCS as a single resistor with resistance 2R and does case C look the same to the CCS as a single resistor with resistance R/2? Explain your reasoning

 

 

Joe Redish 10/31/02

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.