• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Spring potential energy (2012)

Page history last edited by wlosert 11 years, 4 months ago

Class content > Energy: The Quantity of Motion > Kinetic energy and the Work-Energy Theorem  > Energy of place -- potential energy

 

Prerequisites

 

The idea of potential energy is that by changing relative position of two objects, kinetic energy can be changed in a reversible way. We know that if we hang a mass from a spring and pull it down, that displacement creates a stretch of the spring that can accelerate the mass, creating kinetic energy. When we release the mass, the spring pulls it up and the mass starts to move. If the spring has little or no internal friction, the mass will go up, come back down, turn around and start moving up again. So the process looks reversible. Let's see if we can construct the PE of a stretched spring.

 

The work done by a spring

In the example we described in the preamble -- a mass hanging from a spring -- the mass and spring were moving in a way that changed both kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy. This complicates the situation. Let's analyze a simpler case: a cart moving on a horizontal track attached to a spring as shown in the figure at the right. This lets us isolate the potential energy of the spring directly. To simplify the math, we'll describe the position of the cart by a 1D coordinate axis, x, whose origin is placed so the when x = 0, the spring is at its rest length. With this choice of coordinates, the coordinate x becomes the stretch or squeeze of the spring. Since when x is positive the spring is pulling back, Hooke's law in this coordinate system becomes

 

 

This creates a problem since the force changes as we move.  But since it changes linearly, we can get away with a bit of a trick without having to explicitly do an integral.

 

Consider a small change in the cart's position, Δx.  The work done by the spring will be:

Here's our problem: What value of x should we use? Our Δx means that the position is changing:

 

Δx = xfinal - xinitial.

 

 

Since x changes linearly, we might guess that the appropriate value to use is the average:

 

<x> = (xfinal + xinitial)/2.

 

This turns out to be correct. [We can look at the integral explicitly. The average value is the constant that makes the integral exact, so in the case of a linear force, this average approximation is exact.] The result is

 

When we multiply it out we find a work that depends only on the initial and final positions:

 

 

Potential energy of a spring

Since the work only depends on the initial and final positions,  we can define a potential energy for the stretched spring:

(where the parentheses mean "U is a function of x" -- NOT a multiplication).

 

So in general, for an arbitrary stretch or squeeze of a spring, x (positive for a stretch, negative for a squeeze) we can conclude

 

 

Don't forget out assumptions! This is only true for stretches and squeezes of a spring for which Hooke's law is a good model. For larger stretches and squeezes, we have to do the integral of the work explicitly (and maybe even numerically).

 

Sense-making note: Notice that we derived this result using a coordinate system in which "x" means the amount that the spring is stretched or squeezed. It's important that you realize that this is a physical not a mathematical equation. In some cases, instead of "x" we might have "y" or even "y-L0". But it always means the amount that the physical spring is stretched or squeezed!

 

Why the spring is more important than it looks

Springs may seem to be rather uninteresting objects. After all, how often do you actually use as spring?  But the fact that the spring PE is a simple parabola makes it much more important.

 

Any physical system where there is a stable position -- such that a deviation from that position results in forces pushing back toward the stable position -- has a PE with a minimum (a lowest point). Small deviations in the PE from the stable point can be approximately described by a parabola. So the spring provides a good model for everything from  the binding forces in molecules to the vibrations of electric fields in light. At the right is shown a spring PE (parabola -- in red) fit to a typical inter-molecular potential. For small motions near the minimum, the spring PE works pretty well.
 

 

 

Joe Redish 11/3/11

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.