• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Stretching multiple springs - toy model of a muscle

Page history last edited by Mark Eichenlaub 6 years, 7 months ago

4.2.1.P6

 

The muscles in animals are complex structures consisting bundles of long fibers that contract in response to chemical signals. When contractile fibers are lengthened and when they are bundled, how the resulting pull changes depends on the physics of how connected springs add their forces. In order to understand how this works, let's consider a toy model of a muscle: many springs connected in different ways.

 

Since we are modeling with springs and metal springs do not contract on their own, let's think about how they respond to being pulled rather than to pulling. The result is the same except for the direction (signs) of the tension forces. We could construct a mechanical model that would pull, but this model is more straightforward to think about.

 

We'll take as our basic element a single spring (model of a fiber) with rest length 0 and spring constant, k, as shown in the figure at the right. If it is pulled from opposite directions by a tension force, T, it will stretch an amount Δ that satisfies the equation 

T = kΔ

where its stretch length = 0 + Δℓ.

 

First let's consider the effect of linking fibers together end to end into a longer fiber. (In a biological muscle, multiple cells combine actually creating single long cells with multiple nuclei.) This kind of connection is referred to as connected in series.

 

A. Let's start by considering two identical springs each having spring constant, k, linked together and pulled from opposite ends by equal tension forces T. We imagine that they are connected together by molecules that are short and that don't stretch significantly compared to the springs themselves.  

 

A1. Consider this combination as a single "effective" spring. (Imagine it's contained in a box and you can't see that it actually is made up of two separate springs.) How much would it stretch when it is pulled from the two ends by a tension force ?

  1. 0 .
  2. Δ.
  3. .
  4. Δℓ/2.
  5. Something else. (What?)

 

A2. If we define the effective spring constant of the combination by the equation T = keff ΔL, where ΔL is the total amount the combination stretches, how does keff compare to k?

  1. keff = k 
  2. keff = 2k 
  3. keff = k/2
  4. Something else. (What?)

 

A3. Now suppose that we have attached not two springs end to end, but N of them.  Write an equation that expresses the effective spring constant of the combination with the spring constant of the original spring, k, and the number of springs, N.

 

A4. How does the combination of many springs connected in series, thought of as a single spring, compare to the individual components?

  1. It is a softer spring (easier to stretch a given length)
  2. It is a stiffer spring (harder to stretch)
  3. It is the same as the components (equally hard to stretch)
  4. There is not enough information to decide. 

 

Next let's consider the effect of linking fibers to the same connecting and ending point. This kind of connection is referred to as connected in parallel.

 

B. Consider the same two identical springs each having spring constant, k, but this time with both linked at each end to the same point and pulled from opposite ends by equal tension forces T.   

 

 

B1. Consider this combination as a single "effective" spring. (Imagine it's contained in a box and you can't see that it actually is made up of two separate springs.) How much would it stretch when it is pulled from the two ends by a tension force ? 

  1. 0 .
  2. Δ.
  3. .
  4. Δℓ/2.
  5. Something else. (What?)

 

B2. If we define the effective spring constant of the combination by the equation T = keff ΔL, where ΔL is the total amount the combination stretches, how does keff compare to k?

  1. keff = k 
  2. keff = 2k 
  3. keff = k/2
  4. Something else. (What?)

 

B3. Now suppose that we have attached not two springs, but N of them.  Write an equation that expresses the effective spring constant of the combination with the spring constant of the original spring, k, and the number of springs, N.

 

B4. How does the combination of many springs connected in parallel, thought of as a single spring, compare to the individual components?

  1. It is a softer spring (easier to stretch)
  2. It is a stronger spring (harder to stretch)
  3. It is the same as the components (equally hard to stretch)
  4. There is not enough information to decide. 

 

 

Joe Redish  9/6/15

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.