• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

• Dokkio Sidebar (from the makers of PBworks) is a Chrome extension that eliminates the need for endless browser tabs. You can search all your online stuff without any extra effort. And Sidebar was #1 on Product Hunt! Check out what people are saying by clicking here.

View

# The gravitational field (2013)

last edited by 7 years, 5 months ago

Prerequisites

In our discussion of flat-earth gravity we learned that the reason all objects accelerate the same near the surface of the earth is that the force of gravity is proportional to the object's mass.  To make this connection between gravitational force and acceleration we had to assume that the net force (which leads to acceleration according to Newton's second law) is equal to the force of gravity - in other words our object of interest does not interact with anything else but the earth via gravity - it's not held up by a hand or slowed down by air resistance.

This page digs deeper into what "interacting via gravity" means. It seems like the earth is pulling down on each piece of the object with the same force, so bigger objects are pulled down with a bigger force.  If we can ignore air resistance or other interactions then the only force on our object of interest is its weight so

a = Fnet/m = -mg/m = g

Since the force of the earth pulling on the object is mg, then g = W/m has units of N/kg, which conveniently for describing falling bodies, turns out to be the same as the units of acceleration, m/s2.

If we are going to restrict all our considerations to vertical motion near the surface of the earth and treat the earth as flat, the above discussion is sufficient. We can just leave "g" as a fixed number associated with the force of gravity.  But what about the direction of the gravitational force?  The gravitational force should point toward the center of the earth so both the acceleration, and also g can be written as a vector that points to the center of the earth:

But there is more to consider!  As we discuss in the page on Newton's Universal gravitation, the gravitational force does get weaker.  The further we are from the center of the earth, the weaker gravity is.  So for more general situations, we have to take into account that how strong the force is and in what direction it points will change with the position of our object of interest.  So we have to allow g to be a function of position: g(x,y,z), where (x,y,z) represents the point in space where we are measuring a gravitational effect. Since a gravitational force has a direction, we need to write these as vectors:

This is a funny kind of mathematical object -- a vector function of a vector. We call it a field and we refer to the vector function, g, as the gravitational field.

What it means conceptually is pretty straightforward:  Wherever you are in space, you can identify a vector g that has a direction and a magnitude. The gravitational force on an object of mass m placed at that point is mg and the force vector points in the direction of the field vector.

Mathematically things are more complicated:  we have three functions: the x component of g, the y component of g, and the z component of g, and they are each functions of the three variables that determine the position we are looking at:

Let us summarize this in the context of forces :

If we have a gravitational field  it means that if we put an object of mass m at the position labeled by the vector, r, then the object feels a gravitational force .

One way of representing this gravitational field is to put an arrow at every point in space pointing in the direction of the gravitational force an object would feel if it were placed there. This allow us to focus not only on the force that the object feels right now (as we should to calculate its motion right now according to Newton's 0th law), but on the force it would feel when moved somewhere else.

This mathematical representation is really only needed if either we need to be careful about the direction of gravity, or if the gravitational force is different than it is on the surface of the earth.

Finally, thinking ahead, the concept of fields will also be very valuable for analyzing situations where our object of interest experiences interactions with multiple other objects.  While we only worry about gravitational interactions with one object (the earth) in this class, we will encounter examples of electrical forces where our object of interest interacts with multiple other objects via electrical forces.  A  specific example is considering the electrical forces experienced by an atom of interest near the surface of another molecule.   The idea of a "Field" itself is tough so let's try to make sense of it in this case where our object of interest only interacts with one other object.

There are a couple of "dangerous bends".

 Dangerous Bend #1:The direction of the gravitational field does NOT represent the direction in which an object moves when it is experiencing the forces of that field.   It is important to remember that the field determines the gravitational force, but the net force is what determines acceleration.  Furthermore, the direction of acceleration and the direction of motion can be very different as we will see below! Dangerous Bend #2: Despite the name "field", the gravitational field does NOT refer to the region of space in which the gravitational force is significant. It refers to the set of vectors at each point in space.  A field can have zero magnitude or be very small.

Dangerous bend #1 :  if an object is not moving and there are no other forces on it, then it will start moving (accelerate) in the direction of the arrow. But since it is the net force that determines the object's acceleration, if there are any other forces on it, it won't accelerate in the direction of the field arrow.

It is also important to remember that the net force determines the acceleration, which is a change in velocity.  If our object of interest already has a velocity, the force corresponding to the field arrow (assuming that there are no other forces on our object) will point in the direction of the change in velocity, not in the direction of the velocity itself.

In the figure below, we show a representation of a gravitational field near the earth, and a ball thrown at an angle. The little arrows pointing down indicate the direction of g at their center point. We haven't shown an arrow at every point (the entire picture would be red!) but you should imagine that there is an arrow of the gravitational field at every point.

If we take a ball (blue) and throw it in the direction of the blue arrow, the field will push the ball down, but clearly, the direction of motion of the ball will not be in the direction of the field.

Dangerous bend #2 is tempting because we are using the word "field" which in common speech represents an "area" (could be a region in space but also could be in some kind of symbolic space, like "the area of your specialization"). But our fields don't represent this (they have the wrong units, for one), but rather, they are a set of vectors -- they really exist everywhere in space. For forces like gravity and electricity, the influence of a source of these forces falls off like the square of the distance, so it gets smaller but never really goes away. While there are times when we can ignore a gravitational or electrical field because their sources are too far away or because (in the electrical case) there are opposite charges cancelling it, but there we say "the field is weak or negligible". We do NOT say "we are out of the field."

Follow ons:

Joe Redish 10/4/13

Wolfgang Losert 10/4/2013

### Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.